International Travel 2025

This post is intended as a place for discussions about International Travel ONLY.

For more information and previous discussions on the topic, please see International Travel 2024, International Travel 2023, International Travel 2022, International Travel 2021, International Travel 2020 and International Travel 2019.

In this International Travel 2025 post, the information is identical to the International Travel 2024 post. We added a new post for 2025 in order to keep the discussion manageable. Please help us by sticking to the topic of International Travel only.

List of resources shown below:

  1. List of countries that allow sex offenders to visit 
  2. List of 26 European Union Schengen Nations (allowing entry to registrants);
  3. Resources (including a CA DOJ Travel Notification Form); and
  4. User Submitted Travel Reports.

This post is linked from the Main Menu at the top of the site.

List of countries that allow sex offenders to visit 

rentingtofelons.com list of countries (unverified)

registranttag.org list of countries (unverified)

 

The 26 European Union Schengen Nations which allow registrants to visit

As an agreement, Schengen was signed among the five out of ten countries of the European Union members back then, on the 14th June 1985. Under the Schengen agreement, travelling from one Schengen country to another is done without any passport and immigration controls or any other formalities previously required.

Austria
Belgium
Czech republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Italy
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland

Note: US Citizens are visa exempt when visiting the Schengen area for up to 90 days in a 180 day period (List of Countries, Section B or map).  The European Commission is proposing activation of the European Travel Information and Authorization System (ETIAS) for such travelers, beginning sometime in 2025 – which may or may not take criminal convictions into account. ETIAS Fact Sheet April 2018July 2018update Nov-2024

Resources

Forms

Publications

Older Posts

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

383 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Asking again about any effects of the recent immigration crackdown on registered people…

With the increased scrutiny being given to all sorts of non-citizens crossing the borders into the US, has anyone on the registry noticed longer-than-usual wait times for processing in secondary?

It usually takes me 15-20 minutes for them to stare at their computer screen and then return my passport. Has this gotten worse recently?

I hope this article is helpful to my fellow international travelers.
It provides guidance on how to protect your electronics at US borders (think: “secondary” 😮‍💨):

What are your rights if border authorities ask for your phone?:NPR

To add to the NPR and HuffPo articles of late that have been submitted on the topic of phone searches upon returning to the USA:

What To Do If Border Police Ask To Search Your Phone (Reason.com 4 April 2025) Know how much the law does—and doesn’t—protect your privacy rights.

Pretty detailed article on the topic for the traveler and generally accepted every day whereabouts.

Last edited 5 days ago by TS

How much detail does everyone give when supplying a travel itinerary with the required 21 days notice? Do you just supply the departure and return dates with flights? Do you supply details on hotels where you will be staying?

This is Europe specifically but could it come to the USA or impact American travelers overseas?

ICAO Launches Digital Travel Pass to Replace Boarding Cards and Check-ins (ID Tech Wire,14 Apr 2025)

You can read more online through other sources as cited at the bottom.

What’s the data/info we have for traveling to Vietnam and China? Have family I would like to visit. I’m from CA. Here’s my siutation:

  • Got removed from the registry around 11/24 last year
  • Offense was in 2009, for PC 243
  • Got a expungement first
  • Then got a Certificate or Rehabiliation 2nd
  • Finally got a Felony Reduction to Misdemeanor 3rd
  • During the felony reduction process, my attorney discovered that for some reason, my case is sealed

Haven’t gotten a passport yet. Recently started a new job and I passed the extensive background with flying colors. Any info is greatly appreciated.

Hello there guys. Just got back from Mexico.. so just quick run down, the officer here where I live didn’t know what to do with the 21 day notice so I had to explain to him to get down of it… Went into Mexico via car it was a quick get in, no questions asked from anyone, so that a very big plus… stayed with my family and was there from 4/10-4/15.. on the way back they customs checked our passports and I’m assuming because of me they sent us to secondary, told us to get off the car and leave our stuff there. so we got off, they checked inside the car, under and I believe inside one bag.. after like 10 minutes of them walking around they told us we were good to go… so yeah that was my experience.. hopefully its as smooth as this one next time I go…

The current administration has not empowered DHS, ICE, or CBP any more for the searching of a US citizen’s luggage, phone, etc on their return from overseas travel, but the high court has enabled that act for those who need to use it based upon their rulings prior to the current administration…by 100 years (long before the registry concept was instituted in CA and spread like a noxious weed nationally). Since then, the court has extended the act to what society has at their disposal to do nefarious things with regardless of who the person/people are.

There are reasons why people are pulled aside for further inspection regardless of who they are and where they are. Yes, we see what appears to be profiling. It is not PFR centric though, but we read about them more because the forum here invites them to share their experiences where they are impacted by this act. I’d opine that even if there was no registry, the non-PFR could/would still be subjected more often to inspections upon return regardless because of the conviction’s nature (since convictions can be seen so easily now (couple keystrokes/mouse clicks) and have been for a long time, e.g., wants and warrants searches by LE).

I’ve been pulled aside for further inspection based on the timing of my airline ticket being purchased. I remember years ago going across the 49th Parallel border with Canada where extra questioning took place by the border personnel (and even the occasional car search happened to others who did not look shady to begin with). I’m not condoning this extra action either against PFRs or the current administration’s actions with searches (to which they are charged with keeping the country safe using methods they think will work and pass judicial muster), but to incorrectly label an administration about an action that is has been happening for 100 years is not proper either (regardless of one’s opinion about them). It is an emotional reaction like the reaction those who want to crucify PFRs have (Holy Week reference for you), whether elected or appointed to office or just live down the street as a regular citizen.

As long as the high court opines this way, it will remain this way. Take it up with the elected officials who can make a change about it, but don’t expect them to change it (political suicide). In the mean time, read the common sense legal ways around it others have shared here.

For your reading leisure and educational pleasure, the doc below will give a primer on the topic and its going on for 100 years in this country (and longer if you read the preceding 1918 law analysis): The Border Search Exception to the Fourth Amendment (Brown Undergraduate Law Review, 6 May 2024)

Peace.

Last edited 2 days ago by TS

I traveled to Jordan and was denied entry there. I’m not on parole. My passport has the identifier.

Curious about everyone’s travel history. Has anyone here ever experience NOT getting sent to secondary when coming back into the States from abroad?